Skip to main content

Workflow Use Case

Prior Auth & Payer Ops

Reduce manual payer work by combining real-time eligibility and benefits checks — in-network status, deductible, copay, coinsurance, and out-of-pocket maximum — with prior auth workflows, portal automation, and follow-up in one operating flow.

Last updated:

Real-time eligibility, in-network status, deductible, copay, coinsurance, and out-of-pocket exposure surface before scheduling Browser automation handles repetitive payer portal work Aging and renewals stay visible before revenue is at risk

Operational picture

Payer work with less swivel-chair effort

Gather the packet, verify real-time eligibility and benefits — deductible, copay, coinsurance, and out-of-pocket maximum — submit or update through payer workflows, and keep status visible across aging and renewals.

Signals

Real-time eligibility feed
Payer portal
Payer call follow-up

MRI prior auth

Clinical packet ready

Submit through payer portal

Eligibility check

Deductible not yet met · coinsurance returned

Run benefits verification

Expiring auth

Renewal window open

Start renewal follow-up
Portal navigation Status notes captured Aging and renewal alerts

What Calvient handles

The real work inside this workflow

These are the operational motions the system has to coordinate well if the workflow is going to move cleanly.

Work queue

Real-time eligibility and benefits work intake

Bring real-time eligibility, in-network status, deductible and out-of-pocket exposure, copay and coinsurance lookup, auth preparation, payer responses, and renewals into one queue with clear ownership.

Packet prep

Submission readiness and completeness

Check that clinical notes, CPT and HCPCS codes, insurance details, place of service, medical necessity context, and supporting records are present before the case goes out.

Browser agent

Portal automation where APIs do not exist

Use browser workflows to submit, check status, capture reference numbers, and update case notes without repetitive staff clicks.

Aging view

Status follow-up and renewal control

Track which authorizations are pending, denied, expiring, or aging by payer so follow-up stays proactive.

How it works

Structured execution from trigger to closure

The workflow should move because the system keeps state, ownership, and next action visible at every step.

01

Gather the required packet

Collect insurance details, clinical notes, CPT or service context, and any supporting documentation needed by the payer.

Cases are not pushed into payer workflows half-complete.

02

Verify coverage and patient financial responsibility

Run real-time eligibility and benefits verification to confirm in-network status, remaining deductible, copay and coinsurance amounts, and out-of-pocket maximum exposure. Surface prior-auth requirements, patient cost share, and the inputs needed to issue a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act before scheduling.

The team knows whether the case can proceed, what the patient is likely to owe, and what evidence is still required.

03

Submit or update through payer workflow

Use portal automation, structured forms, or payer calls to move the case through the required operational path.

Submission status, reference numbers, and evidence are captured in the record.

04

Track aging, follow up, and renew

Keep pending cases moving, resolve denials or missing items, and start renewals before the authorization expires.

High-burden payer work is visible and manageable instead of reactive.

What operators see

Product views that move the workflow forward

These are the working surfaces that keep the queue understandable, actionable, and measurable.

Tasks

Payer work queue by next action

Staff can sort by eligibility, packet prep, submit, follow-up, denial, or renewal instead of working from disconnected payer lists.

CT auth request

Clinical packet ready to submit

Active

PT eligibility check

Deductible remaining unclear · coinsurance not returned

Active

Sleep study renewal

Expires in 5 days

Active
  • Owner and SLA by payer case
  • Missing artifact flags
  • Submit versus follow-up separation

Browser agent

Portal work with activity captured

Operators can see what the agent submitted, where it clicked, and what payer response came back.

Login + submit packet

Availity flow completed

Active

Status recheck

Pending medical review

Active

Exception flagged

Portal requested new clinical note

Active
  • Reference numbers recorded
  • Portal outcomes logged
  • Exceptions routed to staff review

Reporting

Aging and payer performance view

Managers can see where cases are piling up, which payers create the most rework, and where renewals are slipping.

Payer A

Longest turnaround this week

Active

Payer B

Highest first-pass approval rate

Active

Renewals

3 cases entering risk window

Active
  • Aging by payer
  • First-pass completeness
  • Rework and denial patterns

Workflow Views In Product

In Product Auth work queue screenshot

Auth work queue

Queue grouped by submit, follow-up, denial, and renewal states.

In Product Browser automation activity screenshot

Browser automation activity

Payer portal task detail with logged actions and confirmation note.

Special Agents

Special Agents for this workflow

These agents are useful because they handle the repetitive middle of the workflow while leaving sensitive or ambiguous decisions with staff.

Payer portal submitter

Handles repetitive browser-based submission work and captures what happened for the record.

Trigger

Cases ready for payer portal submission or status review

Actions

  • Navigate payer workflow
  • Submit required fields and attachments
  • Capture confirmation or status response

Handoff

Escalates portal exceptions, denials, or missing-data prompts to the auth team.

Auth status caller

Places structured follow-up calls when portal visibility is weak or payer rules demand phone confirmation.

Trigger

Aging cases or payers that require voice follow-up

Actions

  • Call with case details ready
  • Log structured outcome notes
  • Schedule next follow-up step

Handoff

Routes unresolved or contradictory payer responses to the case owner.

Expiring auth renewal agent

Keeps expiring authorizations from becoming avoidable scheduling or billing problems.

Trigger

Cases approaching expiration or scheduled services beyond current auth window

Actions

  • Open renewal work early
  • Collect needed packet updates
  • Queue or run payer renewal follow-up

Handoff

Escalates only when service dates, payer rules, or clinical context require human review.

Operational channels

The workflow moves across multiple channels without losing state

Payer operations run across portals, calls, documents, and internal queues. Calvient keeps the work in one operating loop.

Fax Text Phone Browser Forms EHR / integrations

Fax

Payer responses, request letters, and supporting clinical documents

Text

Patient outreach when updated insurance or scheduling coordination is needed

Phone

Payer status calls, peer-to-peer coordination, and escalation work

Browser

Portal submission, status checks, evidence uploads, and renewal work

Forms

Structured auth packet prep and internal readiness checklists

EHR / integrations

Clinical note retrieval, chart context, and downstream scheduling coordination

Teams that use this

Deployment usually spans more than one team

This workflow usually crosses prior auth, revenue cycle, scheduling, and nursing review. The system needs to keep all of them on the same case state.

Prior Auth Revenue Cycle Authorization Nurses

KPIs / outcomes

Measure the outcomes that matter

The right operating system should make these measures easier to see, easier to improve, and easier to explain to leadership.

KPI

Auth turnaround time

How long authorizations take from work start to usable approval or resolution.

KPI

First-pass completeness

How often the first submission goes out without preventable missing items.

KPI

Rework rate

How often staff must reopen a case because information, status, or follow-up was incomplete.

KPI

Aging by payer

Which payer queues are creating the most delay and operational burden.

KPI

Patient cost-share accuracy

How often deductible, copay, coinsurance, and out-of-pocket figures presented to staff and patients match the payer of record at the time of service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Calvient verify the patient deductible and out-of-pocket maximum before the visit? +

Yes. Calvient runs real-time eligibility and benefits verification to confirm in-network status, remaining deductible, copay and coinsurance amounts, and out-of-pocket maximum exposure. The values surface in the work queue so staff and patients can resolve cost-share questions before the appointment instead of at check-in.

Can Calvient help with Good Faith Estimate compliance under the No Surprises Act? +

Calvient surfaces the inputs required to issue a Good Faith Estimate — CPT and HCPCS codes, place of service, in-network status, patient cost share, and deductible status — and flags scheduled services where a Good Faith Estimate is required under the No Surprises Act. Staff approve and deliver the estimate through your existing patient communication workflow.

How does Calvient handle copay and coinsurance lookup for inbound referrals? +

When an inbound referral arrives, Calvient queries the patient's payer in real time for eligibility, in-network status, copay, coinsurance, deductible remaining, and any prior-auth requirements. Coverage mismatches and unmet patient responsibility are flagged before the referral is scheduled so the team can reach out with accurate cost expectations.

Can Calvient draft appeal letters automatically? +

Yes. Calvient drafts appeal letters using denial reason codes, clinical documentation, and payer-specific requirements. Staff review and approve the draft before submission rather than writing each letter from a blank page.

How does rework get routed after a denial is identified? +

Calvient assigns denied claims to the appropriate team or individual based on denial type, payer, or dollar threshold. Routing rules are configured during implementation and can be adjusted as volume patterns change.

Does Calvient replace our billing team or support them? +

Calvient supports the billing team by handling the repetitive, high-volume parts of denial management and rework routing. Staff focus on decisions, exceptions, and payer escalations rather than administrative triage.

See Calvient Run Your Workflow Live

Bring one process. Leave with a launch plan.

Your workflow, live Real handoffs Clear next steps